US lawmaker seeks to ban foetuses in food

AFP 27 January 2012
An Oklahoma lawmaker has proposed legislation to ban any use of foetuses in food in one of the more bizarre twists in the emotive US battle over abortion. The bill comes after wild rumors began circulating online and among anti-abortion groups that soft drink giant, Pepsi, was using aborted foetuses in its products. The company has denounced the urban legend as completely false. “PepsiCo does not conduct or fund research that utilises any human tissue or cell lines derived from embryos,” spokesman Peter Land told AFP. The rumours were originally triggered by a patent application by a Pepsi supplier which cited the use of the HEK293 cell line in developing processes for an artificial taste-tester. Originally derived from the kidneys of an aborted foetus in the 1970s, HEK293 is an easy-to-clone line of cells widely used in biotech research. Oklahoma state senator Ralph Shortey said he has been researching the issue for about a year and is concerned there are no rules preventing the use of embryonic stem cells or fetal tissue in food and other products. He introduced the bill in order to raise public awareness and preventing companies from engaging in any such “immoral” practices in his central plains state. “It’s not like I think companies are chopping up foetuses and using them as ingredients in food,” Shortey said in a telephone interview. But Shortey alleged the patent is proof that the supplier – Senomyx – has crossed a moral line by using “kidneys from aborted foetuses” as “taste receptors” to see how the cells respond to different artificial flavoring. “How ethical is it to use what I consider a destroyed human life to make food taste better,” he said.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10781597

Share

4 comments for “US lawmaker seeks to ban foetuses in food

  1. Michael John Whybro
    28 January 2012 at 3:59 pm

    Absolutely GROSS and DISGUSTING!

  2. Anne-Marie Carter
    28 January 2012 at 8:48 pm

    So gross to think about the actual experiment and what is required to conduct that experiment.

  3. bob
    28 January 2012 at 9:05 pm

    Good on Ralph Shortey! Especially good was his clarification about not thinking Pepsi were actually chopping up foetuses and putting them in Pepsi products – it helps in preventing the pro-choice lobby from making ridiculous claims about pro-lifers 🙂

    This Bill also shows how little we know about how food products are being made nowadays. Immoral production techniques may happen several stages back from the actual final food manufacturing.

  4. bob
    28 January 2012 at 9:11 pm

    Whoops – forgot to ask – what is the state of law in NZ? IIRC, cloning is banned, but is the use of human tissues in food production? (heck, for any non-medical process) If not, perhaps that would be a good Member’s Bill for a pro-life NZ MP to take up? Perhaps the Human Tissues Protection Bill?

    By protecting human tissues, this still allows use of knowledge about human genetic and biological processes to be used for other medical and non-medical processes. Just doesn’t let any physical human body parts or cell lines get used. There may still be moral issues around using knowledge derived from immoral research techniques (like embryonic stem cell research), though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *